ROOH ULLAH vs MATIULLAH O — 2021 CLC 1998 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2021 CLC 1998 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2021
Reporter: CLC
Parties: ROOH ULLAH vs MATIULLAH O
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 6---S; Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ROOH ULLAH VS MATIULLAH O.XXXVII, R.2---Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), S.6---Suit for recovery of amount---Cheque---Scope---Cheque falls within the definition of negotiable instrument whereupon the plaintiff can file suit under O.XXXVII, R.2 of C.P.C.

Other judgments reported in 2021 CLC

2021 CLC 2042 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTAMIR ZADA VS Mian ZAMIN KHAN Non-obstante clause, over-riding factor of---Non-obstante clause was a legislative tool employed to give an ove…
2021 CLC 2042 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTAMIR ZADA VS Mian ZAMIN KHAN Procedural laws, retrospective effect of---Procedural laws normally have a retrospective effect, unless provide…
2021 CLC 746 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTMst. BIBI ROZA VS WALI-UR-REHMAN S.12(2)---application under S.12(2) C.P.C---Framing of issues---Scope---Though application under S.12(2) of…
2021 CLC 1813 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRTAHIR AYUB VS NAEEM AYUB S.122---Specific Relief act (I of 1877), Ss.42 & 12---"Gift"---Counter deeds---Registered document, evidentiary val…
2021 CLC 1813 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRTAHIR AYUB VS NAEEM AYUB 'Hiba', defined---Essentials of---Delivery of possession, over-riding effect of---Hiba was an unconditional transfe…
2021 CLC 1813 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRTAHIR AYUB VS NAEEM AYUB 'Gift', essentials of---Declaration, delivery of possession and without consideration---Any deed which involved any…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English