PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ASADULLAH vs State S — 2021 MLD 408 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2021 MLD 408 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
MLD
Parties
ASADULLAH vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 324---C; S. 161; Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ASADULLAH VS State S.324---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss.161 & 162---Qatl-i-amd---Supplementary statement of complainant---Value---Accused contended that supplementary statement of complainant could not be exhibited, but the Trial Court overruled the objection---Validity---Supplementary statement had got no sanctity in the eye of law---Value of supplementary statement or further statement was not more than a statement recorded under S.161, Cr.P.C.---In the present case, the Trial Court erred in law while exhibiting the supplementary statement purportedly made by complainant---Said supplementary statement of the complainant was nothing more than a statement recorded under S.161, Cr.P.C., which could neither be equated with First Information Report (FIR) nor could be construed as an extension thereof---Such statement could not be used for any purpose other than one provided in S.161, Cr.P.C.---Trial Court while exhibiting the supplementary statement of the complainant had committed an error, therefore, the objection raised by the accused was sustainable, which was wrongly overruled by the trial court---Criminal revision petition was accepted and the objection of the defence was sustained.

Other judgments reported in 2021 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English