PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Mst. SAFEENA SHAH vs State S — 2021 PCrLJ 668 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2021 PCrLJ 668 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Mst. SAFEENA SHAH vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 513---B; S. 513

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Mst. SAFEENA SHAH VS State S. 513---Bond---Cash deposit of security---Scope---Petitioner sought permission to deposit the surety amount in cash---Prosecution raised objection that S. 513, Cr.P.C. did not authorize the Court to demand cash security---Held; S. 513, Cr.P.C., did not authorize a Court to demand cash security, however, the same could be permitted only if required by the accused---Words "permit him to deposit" used in S. 513, Cr.P.C., were not without significance and suggested of a situation where something was permitted upon the request of the accused but never ordered by the Court of its own---Object of S. 513, Cr.P.C., was to enable an accused to deposit cash security in case if he was unable to find out sureties---Accused did not belong to District 'H', she was a permanent resident of District 'R' and did not seem to have sufficient link at District 'H'---Request of accused, being genuine, was accepted, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English