PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF AJ&K, MUZAFFARABAD vs Raja WASEEM YOUNIS, ADVOCATE, EX-GENERAL SECRETARY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, MIRPUR art — 2021 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation
2021 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2021
Reporter
PLD
Parties
M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF AJ&K, MUZAFFARABAD vs Raja WASEEM YOUNIS, ADVOCATE, EX-GENERAL SECRETARY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, MIRPUR art

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF AJ&K, MUZAFFARABAD VS Raja WASEEM YOUNIS, ADVOCATE, EX-GENERAL SECRETARY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, MIRPUR art. 43(2-a)---Judge of High Court azad Jammu and Kashmir, appointment of --appointment by President on the advice of the Council and after consultation with the Chief Justice of azad Jammu and Kashmir and Chief Justice of the High Court---Question as to whether such consultation with Chief Justices was to be made before the advice of the Council----Held, that for seeking the advice of the Council, the consultation of the appointing authority (i.e. the President) with the Chief Justices was the most basic pre-requisite---Chief Justices, in view of the practice and ground realities, were only the concerned persons who were best placed to judge the ability, neutrality and other required qualities of the person to be appointed as Judge of High Court---Neither the President nor the Council had other alternate or direct means or sources to judge the required abilities of a person for appointment as a Judge.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English