PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF AJ&K, MUZAFFARABAD vs Raja WASEEM YOUNIS, ADVOCATE, EX-GENERAL SECRETARY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, MIRPUR art — 2021 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation
2021 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2021
Reporter
PLD
Parties
M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF AJ&K, MUZAFFARABAD vs Raja WASEEM YOUNIS, ADVOCATE, EX-GENERAL SECRETARY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, MIRPUR art

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

M. TABASSUM AFTAB ALVI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF AJ&K, MUZAFFARABAD VS Raja WASEEM YOUNIS, ADVOCATE, EX-GENERAL SECRETARY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, MIRPUR art. 43(2-a)---Judge of High Court azad Jammu and Kashmir, appointment of---President to consult the Chief Justice of azad Jammu and Kashmir and Chief Justice of the High Court---Consultation---Meaning---Requirement of consultation could only be fulfilled if the appointing authority (i.e. the President) had sought an effective, meaningful, purposive, consensus oriented and simultaneous consultation with both the Chief Justices---Consultation with the Chief Justices was not a mere formality rather it was the most basic requirement---For determination of the process of consultation, the basic requirement was reasonable passing of information on the matter in issue, between the authorities concerned, meaning thereby the appointing authority and the Chief Justices.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English