PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SWAT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, HARIPUR vs Mst — 2021 PLD 146 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2021 PLD 146 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PLD
Parties
SWAT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, HARIPUR vs Mst
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 12

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SWAT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, HARIPUR VS Mst. NABEELA S. 12(2)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Counsel and client---Liability---Petitioners sought setting aside of judgment and decree on the plea of fraud and misrepresentation---Trial Court and Lower Appellate Court declined to set aside judgment and decree in exercise of powers under S.12(2), C.P.C.---Plea raised by petitioners was that Vakalatnama used was issued for some other purpose and not for litigation in question---Validity---Vakalatnama showed that title of case in question was specifically written, which suggested that Vakalatnama/Power of attorney was issued to counsel for contesting suit in question---Vakalatnama/Power of attorney gave authorization to enter into arbitration, settlement or compromise which was expressly been conferred on the attorney/advocate---Attorney or advocate had not committed fraud with petitioners, who failed to make out a case of fraud or misrepresentation out of the record against respondents or anyone else---When an attorney/advocate had defrauded a person, the only remedy available to that person was to sue his attorney for damages or recovery of any such amount on his part---Other parties could not be dragged into litigation just because of the fact that an advocate had allegedly committed some fraud with any person---Application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. was moved by petitioners beyond prescribed period of three years---High Court declined to accept the plea that petitioners had learnt about judgment and decree in question a few days before filing of application under S.12(2), C.P.C.---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English