PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ABDUL QADEER vs Mst — 2021 PLD 22 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2021 PLD 22 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PLD
Parties
ABDUL QADEER vs Mst
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 52---C; S. 12; S. 12---S; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABDUL QADEER VS Mst. NAZIMA SHAHEEN S. 52---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.12(2)---Specific Relief act (I of 1877), S. 12---Suit for specific performance of contract---Compromise decree, setting aside of---Fraud and misrepresentation---General attorney of defendant during pendency of suit entered into an agreement with the petitioner to sell---Defendant entered into compromise with the plaintiff and consent decree was passed---Lis pendens, principle of---applicability---Contention of petitioner was that consent decree had been obtained by suppressing material facts from the Court---Petition for setting aside of consent decree was dismissed concurrently---Defendant being owner of suit property had entered into an agreement to sell with the plaintiff and had settled the matter---Defendant had never entered into any transaction or agreement with the present petitioner---alleged agreement to sell with the petitioner had been executed on behalf of attorney of defendant during pendency of suit when restraining order with regard to further alienation of suit property was in the field---No fraud or misrepresentation had been committed by the defendant with the petitioner or with the Court---Petitioner had purchased suit property during pendency of suit and no fraud or misrepresentation was visible from the material placed on file on the part of defendant---Transaction which had taken place during pendency of suit had no protection as it was hit by the principle of 'lis pendens'---Findings recorded by the Courts below were based on proper appreciation of facts and law applicable thereto---If any fraud or misrepresentation had been committed on the part of general attorney of defendant then same could be remedied through suit for damages and recovery of amount paid by the petitioner---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English