PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Mst. ZAHIDA PARVEEN vs LAMREY CERAMICS (PVT — 2021 PLD 635 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2021 PLD 635 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PLD
Parties
Mst. ZAHIDA PARVEEN vs LAMREY CERAMICS (PVT
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 5; S. 152---P; S. 152; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908); Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984); Companies Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Mst. ZAHIDA PARVEEN VS LAMREY CERAMICS (PVT.) LIMITED S. 5 & art. 163--- Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.IX, Rr. 3, 4, 8 & 9---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984) [since repealed], S. 152---Petition under S.152 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 dismissed due to default/non prosecution---application seeking restoration of petition---Limitation for filing such application---Condonation of delay---If an application was dismissed due to default as provided under O.IX, R. 3 or R. 8, P.P.C. it could be restored in accordance with O.IX, R.4 & R. 9 of C.P.C. provided that such restoration was sought within the limitation period of thirty days as specifically provided under art. 163 of Limitation act, 1908---Therefore the time limitation for filing an application for restoration of a petition under S.152 of the Ordinance was thirty days from the date of its dismissal---although S.5 of Limitation act, 1908 was made applicable to such an application for restoration, however, the petitioner was bound to establish sufficient cause, which prevented him/her to approach the Court within the period of limitation.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English