PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE vs KAMAL STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE Retrospective application of laws — 2021 PTD 1396 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2021 PTD 1396 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PTD
Parties
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE vs KAMAL STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE Retrospective application of laws

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS KAMAL STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE Retrospective application of laws---Scope---Any change in substantive law, which divested and adversely affected vested rights of parties, should always have prospective application unless by express wording or by necessary intendment/implication; such law had been made applicable retrospectively---Substitution in a provision could not obliterate vested rights and a Legislation did not operate retrospectively if it touched a right in existence at time of passing of such Legislation---Rights of parties were to be decided according to law existing when an action under a statute began; unless provisions were made to the contrary---Where a statute itself did not make its operation retrospective, it would not be reasonable to claim that by necessary implication it had retrospective application.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English