PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE vs OLYMPIA CHEMICALS LTD — 2021 PTD 1512 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2021 PTD 1512 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PTD
Parties
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE vs OLYMPIA CHEMICALS LTD

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS OLYMPIA CHEMICALS LTD., LAHORE Effect of repeal or amendment ---Retrospective effect of such repeal or amendment --- Principles of construction where vested / accrued rights were involved---Scope---In absence of a stipulation to contrary, any change in law affecting substantive rights had to have prospective effect---Courts were to lean against giving retrospective operation where no vested rights or past transactions prejudicially affected or existed---Legislation did not operate retrospectively if it touched a right in existence at time of passing of such Legislation---Statutes were to be presumed to be applicable to cases and facts coming into existence after their enactment unless there existed clear intention to give them retrospective effect---Statutes need not to be read in such a way as to change accrued rights and rights of parties were to be decided according to law existing when action began, unless provisions were made to contrary---Any substituted section in a provision could not obliterate accrued rights---Generally, a repealed law was to be considered a law that never existed, however, for purpose of such actions which were commenced, prosecuted and concluded under said law, it would be considered as an existing law.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English