PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

CHENAB FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Proviso to a provision in a statute — 2021 PTD 892 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2021 PTD 892 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2021
Reporter
PTD
Parties
CHENAB FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Proviso to a provision in a statute

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

CHENAB FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Proviso to a provision in a statute---Scope and purpose---As a general rule, a proviso was added to an enactment to qualify or create an exception to what was in the enactment---Ordinarily, a proviso was not interpreted as stating a general rule---However a proviso which was inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the provision workable, (or) a proviso which supplied an obvious omission in the section and was required to be read into the section to give the section a reasonable interpretation, was required to be treated as retrospective in operation, so that a reasonable interpretation could be given to the section as a whole.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English