PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD AFZAL vs SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ISLAMABAD S — 2021 SCMR 1569 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2021 SCMR 1569 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2021
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
MUHAMMAD AFZAL vs SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ISLAMABAD S
Subject matter
Service
Provisions referred to
S. 4

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD AFZAL VS SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ISLAMABAD S. 4 & Preamble---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4, 9 & 25---Sacked Employees (Re-instatement) Act, 2010, ('Act of 2010'), vires of---Legislature had, through the operation of the Act of 2010, attempted to extend undue benefit to a limited class of employees---In terms of the Act of 2010 upon the 'reinstatement' of the 'sacked employees', the 'status' of the employees currently in service was violated as the reinstated employees were granted seniority over them---Legislature had, through legal fiction, deemed that employees from a certain time period were reinstated and regularized without due consideration of how the fundamental rights of the people currently serving would be affected---Rights of the employees who had completed codal formalities through which civil servants were inducted into service and complied with the mandatory requirements laid down by the regulatory framework could not be allowed to be placed at a disadvantageous position through no fault of their own---Act of 2010 was also in violation of the right enshrined under Art. 4 of the Constitution, that provided citizens equal protection before law, as backdated seniority was granted to the 'sacked employees' who, out of their own volition, did not challenge their termination or removal under their respective regulatory frameworks---Given that none of the 'sacked employees' opted for the remedy available under law upon termination during the limitation period, the transaction had essentially become one that was past and closed; they had foregone their right to challenge their orders of termination or removal---Sacked Employees (Reinstatement) Act, 2010 had extended undue advantage to a certain class of citizens thereby violating the fundamental rights (Articles 4, 9, and 25 of the Constitution) of the employees in the Service of Pakistan and was thus void and ultra vires the Constitution.

Other judgments reported in 2021 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English