Dr. ZOHARA JABEEN vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM PERVAIZ S — 2021 SCMR 194 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2021 SCMR 194 SUPREME-COURT
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year: 2021
Reporter: SCMR
Parties: Dr. ZOHARA JABEEN vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM PERVAIZ S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 7---P; S. 7; Punjab Civil Servants Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Dr. ZOHARA JABEEN VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM PERVAIZ S. 7---Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974, R. 8---District Population Welfare Officers---'Promotees' and 'direct appointees'---Seniority---Scope---Direct appointees/respondents were appointed through initial appointment on 3-12-2003, a day after the promotion of the first promotees out of the batch of promotees; hence the direct appointees would fall under the promotees in the seniority list---Appeals were allowed. Citation Name: 2021 SCMR 194 SUPREME-COURTBookmark this Case Dr. ZOHARA JABEEN VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM PERVAIZ S. 7(2), proviso---Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974, R. 8(2), Explanation---Batch of 'promotees'---Seniority---Scope---Where civil servants were selected for promotion in a "batch'" or as a "group of persons" then the date of promotion of all the persons in the batch or the group shall be the date when anyone of them was first promoted to the post and they shall retain their inter se seniority---Word "batch" used in S. 7 of Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 ('the Act') had been interchangeably used as "group of persons" in R. 8 of Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974---Promotees in the same grade, when considered and recommended for promotion for the next grade in the same Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) passed for a "batch" or "group of persons" and therefore as would be considered to have been promoted from the date when the first amongst the batch was promoted and would also retain their inter se seniority of the lower post.

Other judgments reported in 2021 SCMR

2021 SCMR 557 SUPREME-COURTMUHAMMAD DANIYAL FARRUKH ANSARI VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 11, 20, 21 & 22---Penal Code (XLV of…
2021 SCMR 1016 SUPREME-COURTAHMAD KHALID BUTT VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 20, 21 & 24---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 34 & 1…
2021 SCMR 1358 SUPREME-COURTFAYYAZ HUSSAIN VS EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT RAWALPINDI Ss. 4(1)(b) & 5(1)(a)---Willful absence from d…
2021 SCMR 702 SUPREME-COURTREGIONAL OPERATION CHIEF, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, REGIONAL OFFICE, SARGODHA VS Mst. NUSRAT PERVEEN Pt. II, Cha…
2021 SCMR 645 SUPREME-COURTABID HUSSAIN VS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN Order which was vague, without jurisdiction or illegal---To challenge…
2021 SCMR 645 SUPREME-COURTABID HUSSAIN VS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN Ordinary meaning of a provision---Scope---Any provision of law had to…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English