ABDUL WADOOD vs State S — 2021 YLR 560 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2021 YLR 560 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2021
Reporter: YLR
Parties: ABDUL WADOOD vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 161---P; S. 161

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABDUL WADOOD VS State S. 161---Police Rules 1934, R.25.2 (3)---Recording of statements of witnesses---Mode---Investigation officer is not supposed to record statements of prosecution witnesses while acting as 'stenographer' rather he is obliged, as required under S.161, Cr.P.C., to 'examine' the person whose evidence / statement he is going to record.

Other judgments reported in 2021 YLR

2021 YLR 110 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANDEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)/COLLECTOR VS MEHRULLAH KHAN. Ss. 18 & 23 - Reference to court - Enhancement of compensation - Referee Judge en…
2021 YLR 90 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANRAKHSHANDA JAMAL VS SHAHID-UL-HASSAN. Art. 199 - Constitutional petition - Maintainability - Pendency of criminal proceedings - Petitioner s…
2021 YLR 2068 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTGHULAM MUHAMMAD VS REGIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR FEDERAL OMBUDSMAN, PESHAWAR ambiguity, avoiding of---Principle---Each and every part of statute…
2021 YLR 328 ISLAMABADMUHAMMAD NAWAZ VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 406, 468, 471 & 109---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 1…
2021 YLR 2033 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTMUHEEB ULLAH VS State absconsion---Scope---Conviction of an accused could not be based on his abscondence when otherwise the prosecution fai…
2021 YLR 1560 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTMEHBOOB-UR-REHMAN VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 149--- Bail--- Common object---Vicarious liability---Scope---Question of vi…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English