BAKHT RAWAN vs State Ss — 2021 YLRN 79 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

BAKHT RAWAN VS State Ss. 302(b), 109 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Site plan---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of mother and sister-in-law of the complainant on the instigation of co-accused---Record showed that in the site plan, there were rivulet/water channel and pathway on the northern side of the field where the occurrence took place---In the north side of the said channel there was field in which the maize crop was grown---Houses of accused were situated in the north side of the said field---Movement of the sheep and goats of the accused from their house and reaching to the field of complainant, avoiding the intervening maize field for grazing and thereafter crossing the water channel and path, appeared to be a concocted story---Circumstances established that the prosecution case was full of various inconsistencies of glaring nature which were sufficient to create several reasonable doubts in prudent mind qua the guilt of the accused---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

BAKHT RAWAN vs State Ss — 2021 YLRN 79 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported