MADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED vs SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S — 2022 CLD 1051 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHI

Case information

Citation: 2022 CLD 1051 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHI
Year: 2022
Reporter: CLD
Parties: MADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED vs SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 1---S; S. 21; S. 22; Scope---Sindh Environmental Protection Act; Sindh Environmental Protection Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S. 1---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Environmental Examination and Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations, 2014, Regln. 1---Commencement---Retrospective effect---Scope---Sindh Environmental Protection Act, 2014 and Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Environmental Examination and Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations, 2014 cannot have retrospective effect. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2022 CLD 1051 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIBookmark this Case MADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Ss. 17, 21 & 22---Initial environmental examination and environmental impact assessment---Environmental Protection Order---Closure of factory---Scope---Appellant assailed order passed by Director General, Sindh Environmental Protection Agency whereby he had ordered the appellant to forthwith close its business activities of Control Shed Poultry Farm---Validity---Order passed by respondent was beyond the scope of S. 21(2)(a) of the Sindh Environmental Protection Act, 2014---Such order of closure of the unit could only be passed by Environmental Protection Tribunal under S. 22(5)(b) after due trial of the case and on conviction of the accused with punishment on commission of the offence---Appellant, during the course of arguments, had showed his readiness to apply for environmental approval by submitting Environmental Management Plan to the department for due compliance but for this purpose it sought time of 90 days---Impugned order was set aside and the appellant was directed to file Environmental Audit report and Environmental Management Plant before the department within 90 days---Appeal was disposed of accordingly. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLD

2022 CLD 626 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHISINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY VS DIAMOND RESIDENCY through Owner/ Chief Executive Officer Ss. 17 & 1---Initial environmental examina…
2022 CLD 502 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIARIF BELGAUMI VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (SEPA) S. 17---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Environmental…
2022 CLD 233 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIRAFHAN MAIZE PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD. VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH Ss. 11, 13 & 14---Prohibition o…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED S. 5(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963 [since repe…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED Ss. 6, 8(a) & 10(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963…
2022 CLD 656 SUPREME-COURTMrs. NAILA NAEEM YOUNUS VS INDUS SERVICES LIMITED S. 126---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984) [since substituted by the Companies Act, 2017…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English