HUMAYUN MIRZA vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SHAHPUR SADAR, TEHSIL SHAHPUR, DISTRICT SARGODHA S — 2022 CLD 1058 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2022 CLD 1058 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: CLD
Parties: HUMAYUN MIRZA vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SHAHPUR SADAR, TEHSIL SHAHPUR, DISTRICT SARGODHA S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 2; S. 22-A---P; S. 409---C; S. 22-A; Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898); A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

HUMAYUN MIRZA VS STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SHAHPUR SADAR, TEHSIL SHAHPUR, DISTRICT SARGODHA S. 2(c)---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 22-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 409---Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by Banker, merchant or agent---Scope---Petitioner assailed order passed by Ex-officio Justice of Peace whereby his application under S. 22-A, Cr.P.C. was dismissed on the ground that the matter came within the provisions of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Case of petitioner was that a sugar mill had obtained the facility of loan from petitioner/Bank by pledging sugar bags---Bank appointed surveyors for security of the stock but during joint inspection came to know that the pledged sugar bags were missing---Bank alleged that the sugar bags were misappropriated/ sold/alienated by respondents/ proposed accused persons---Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 was only applicable where there was a relationship of customer and financial institution between the parties---Proposed accused persons did not come within the definition of customer---Surveyor, by virtue of its appointment, had become an agent of the Bank and had to act in accordance with such agency---Constitutional petition was accepted and the SHO was directed to record statement of petitioner.

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLD

2022 CLD 1051 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIMADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S. 1---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Envi…
2022 CLD 626 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHISINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY VS DIAMOND RESIDENCY through Owner/ Chief Executive Officer Ss. 17 & 1---Initial environmental examina…
2022 CLD 502 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIARIF BELGAUMI VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (SEPA) S. 17---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Environmental…
2022 CLD 233 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIRAFHAN MAIZE PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD. VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH Ss. 11, 13 & 14---Prohibition o…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED S. 5(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963 [since repe…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED Ss. 6, 8(a) & 10(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English