PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

TAMOOR AHMAD vs State S — 2022 MLD 1046 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 MLD 1046 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
MLD
Parties
TAMOOR AHMAD vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 221---C

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

TAMOOR AHMAD VS State S.221---Charge to state offence---Object of framing charge---Scope---Whole object of framing charge is to enable the accused to know that what is precise accusation against him and concentrate his attention on the case that he has to meet i.e. to ensure that the accused had sufficient notice of the nature of accusation with which he was charged and secondly to make the Court concerned conscious regarding the real points in issue---Although charge must contain facts which are essential factors of the offence in question, however, no yardstick can be fixed qua the particulars which should be mentioned in the charge as it depends upon facts/ circumstances of each case---Prime consideration which is of vital importance/mandatory with respect to charge is that accused must not be misled in his defence by omission/error in the charge---If contents of charge are not misleading the accused in his defence then there is no defect of material nature in the charge; in other words, if nature of accusation has been incorporated in the charge with relevant provision of law applicable in categorical manner eliminating possibility of any confusion or prejudice then such charge cannot be termed as defective---If particulars of the offence are not mentioned in the charge and accused is convicted for said offence then it can be said that such omission caused prejudice to the accused in his defence but if particulars and provision of law are mentioned in the charge and subsequently same is not proved during trial then accused certainly gets the benefit of acquittal and practically speaking no prejudice is caused to the accused i.e. in simple words, framing of charge does not mean conviction and if it is not proved then of course, it results into acquittal and accused does not suffer from any prejudice.

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English