PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AMJAD SIDDIQUE vs SNGPL Ss — 2022 MLD 112 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 MLD 112 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
MLD
Parties
AMJAD SIDDIQUE vs SNGPL Ss
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 29

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AMJAD SIDDIQUE VS SNGPL Ss.6 & 29---Complaints and suits for default before Gas Utility Courts---Procedure---Scope---Petitioner sought order restraining the Gas company/respondent (company) from en-cashing the Bank guarantee---Validity---Bank guarantee could not be stayed, therefore, no restraining order was passed against the encashment of Bank guarantee---Company was at liberty to en-cash the Bank guarantee in its discretion, however, if the company en-cashed the Bank guarantee, the amount of Bank guarantee, would be deposited with the Gas Utility Court under S.29 of the Gas (Theft Control and Recovery) Act, 2016---Amount so deposited shall be invested in the scheduled Bank in the name of company on an undertaking furnished by the company to the effect that in case the pending suits were decided against it, it shall be paid to the petitioner, as the case may be, with reasonable returns as the Gas Utility Court may determine, as required under S.29(2) of the Gas (Theft Control and Recovery) Act, 2016---Said amount would be utilized in execution of the decree that may be eventually passed in the pending consolidated suits by the parties against each other---Constitutional petition was accepted.

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English