PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

RASHID ZAMAN vs AFZAL AWAN, SHO POLICE STATION TAKHT-E-NASRATI, DISTRICT KARAK S — 2022 MLD 1227 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2022 MLD 1227 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
MLD
Parties
RASHID ZAMAN vs AFZAL AWAN, SHO POLICE STATION TAKHT-E-NASRATI, DISTRICT KARAK S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 36; Narcotic Substances Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

RASHID ZAMAN VS AFZAL AWAN, SHO POLICE STATION TAKHT-E-NASRATI, DISTRICT KARAK S.36(2)---Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts), Rules, 2001, R.6---Government Analyst Report---Protocols of test applied---Non-observance---Effect---Every test has its protocols, which are internationally recognized---Test without observance of its protocols has no sanctity---Full Protocols include description of each and every step employed by Government Analyst through the course of conducting a test---Report under R.6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts), Rules, 2001, must specify every test applied for determination of seized substances with full protocols adopted to conduct such tests---Non-compliance of R.6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts), Rules, 2001, can frustrate purpose and object of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, i.e., control of production, processing and trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances---Conviction cannot be sustained on a Report that is inconclusive or unreliable---Evidentiary assumption attached to a Report of Government Analyst under S.36(2) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 underlines statutory significance of Report---Details of test and analysis in the shape of protocols applied for the test become fundamental and go to the root of statutory scheme---Provision of R.6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts), Rules, 2001, is in public interest and safeguards rights of parties---Any Report (Form-II) failing to give details of full protocols of test applied is inconclusive, unreliable, suspicious and untrustworthy and do not meet evidentiary assumption attached to a Report of Government Analyst under S.36(2) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English