PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SINDH AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY TANDO JAM vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi S — 2022 MLD 263 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2022 MLD 263 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
MLD
Parties
SINDH AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY TANDO JAM vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi S
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 6---D

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SINDH AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY TANDO JAM VS PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi S.6---Declaration that land is required for a public purpose---Scope---Petitioner assailed acquisition proceedings being conducted by the Provincial Government for construction of a road---Only dispute raised by the petitioner was that some other piece of land should be acquired in lieu of the subject land and as the same was being used for research and experimental purposes---Validity---Acquiring agency had the sole discretion and authority to see the suitability of land for purpose of acquisition---Land acquisition proceedings were not a direct transaction between a willing vendor and a willing vendee; it was the will, choice and selection of the government/acquiring agency with regard to a land which stood paramount---Land owner had no right whatsoever to hinder such will, choice and selection, except to demand reasonable compensation in lieu of the land---Mala fides with regard to the will, choice and selection of the land could not be attributed to the government/acquiring agency merely on the basis of allegations---Tappedar of the area had reported that no valuable plantation was found on the subject land which was in fact being used by the petitioner for cultivation of cotton, sugarcane and wheat for commercial gain---Such being a disputed question of fact, could not be looked into by the High Court---Constitutional petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English