PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ABDUL WAHID vs MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE R — 2022 MLD 488 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 MLD 488 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
MLD
Parties
ABDUL WAHID vs MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE R
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABDUL WAHID VS MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE R.17---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Headman (Lumbardar), appointment of---Hereditary claim---Substitution of findings---Respondent was appointed as headman (Lumbardar) after death of his real uncle---Validity---Number of factors existed which were relevant for appointment of a headman---Hereditary claim of candidates was one of those factors according to which 30 marks were awarded to a candidate falling in first blood---Respondent was nephew of deceased headman and that was the reason he was recommended by Authority concerned to be appointed as village headman on the basis of various preferential reasons including hereditary claim--- High Court while exercising Constitutional jurisdiction could not substitute its findings in order to undertake an exercise for evaluating available material to determine suitability of candidates---Competent authorities in revenue hierarchy had already considered merits of petitioner and respondent and after analyzing all pros and cons decided to appoint respondent as village headman instead of petitioner---Order of lower revenue hierarchy was questioned by petitioner up to revisional forum and then a review was filed but he failed to point out any illegality or jurisdictional defect in such orders---High Court declined to interfere in appointment of respondent as village headman as there were concurrent findings of revenue hierarchy and the same were based on proper appraisal of relevant material---Constitutional jurisdiction could only be exercised if it appeared the Court that there was some patent illegality or jurisdictional defect in the order assailed---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English