ABDUL BARI vs AKHTAR RASHEED, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION AIRPORT, QUETTA Ss — 2022 MLD 805 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2022 MLD 805 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: MLD
Parties: ABDUL BARI vs AKHTAR RASHEED, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION AIRPORT, QUETTA Ss
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABDUL BARI VS AKHTAR RASHEED, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION AIRPORT, QUETTA Ss.3, 8 & 12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11---Suit for defamation/damages against Police Officer for circulation of false statement/representation---Essentials---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Suit was dismissed by Trial Court---Validity---No estimation and clear calculation had been given by the appellant as to how and which act of the defendant caused financial loss, mental agony and defamation to the appellant which was not clear by the appellant in his plaint/suit---Report submitted by the police officials before the competent court of law did not come within the definition of "defamation"---No disclosure in plaint as to on which words/actions of the respondents petitioner/plaintiff received mental agony and defamation which disrepute him in public at large or to his friends and relatives---Appellant/plaintiff had not complied with the mandatory requirements of Rr. 2 & 4 of O.VI of C.P.C.---Legal notice was given to the SHO of police station with a delay of more than eleven months---Plaint did not disclose any cause of action---No date/month had been mentioned in plaint as to where/when the respondents caused financial loss and before whom reputation was disrepute and damaged---Suit appeared to be barred by limitation, so plaint should have to be rejected under O.VII, R.11 of C.P.C---Impugned judgment of the Trial Court had rightly been passed---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

2022 MLD 1664 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANSUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE VS MUHAMMAD RAHIM When a law requires anything to be done in a particular manner, it should b…
2022 MLD 584 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREABDULLAH KHAN VS State R.6---Report of result of test or analysis---Mandatory provision---Scope---Rule 6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (…
2022 MLD 563 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANSyed GULISTAN VS GULAB KHAN Evidence beyond pleadings---Scope---Where the party has not alleged any ground in pleadings, subsequent evidence…
2022 MLD 1612 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSULEMAN VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If a single circumstance created reasonable doubt in a prudent mind about the apprehension o…
2022 MLD 663 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREIMTIAZ AHMAD VS State Witness---Statement of injured witness, reliance upon---Scope---Injuries on the person of a witness may established hi…
2022 MLD 1195 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORELIAQAT ALI VS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUJRAT S.3---Intra court Appeal before High Court----Scope---Original Order---Scope---Application before H…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English