PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD KHALID MUNIR vs NAZAR SADIQ S — 2022 MLD 831 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2022 MLD 831 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
MLD
Parties
MUHAMMAD KHALID MUNIR vs NAZAR SADIQ S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 12---C; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908); Validity---Within Civil Procedure Code; Civil Procedure Code

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD KHALID MUNIR VS NAZAR SADIQ S.12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. IX, R.9---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Suit dismissed for non-prosecution---Restoration---Time frame---Sufficient cause for non-appearance---Determination---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell filed by respondent / plaintiff was dismissed for non-prosecution--- Two applications for restoration were dismissed by Trial Court but on third application, the suit was restored---Validity---Within Civil Procedure Code, 1908, time frames are provided to regulate cycle of a dispute that enters adjudicatory process---If such time frames are not abided by, the cost inflicted on public interest is debilitating--- Civil Procedure Code, 1908, confers penal powers on Court to enforce prescribed time lines to move along adjudication of suit in order to conclude proceedings within a reasonable period of time--- Entire scheme is meant to ensure that justice is delivered according to law within time lines prescribed by law--- Order of restoration of suit absolved respondent / plaintiff of his obligation to establish sufficient cause as required under O.IX, R.9, C.P.C.---Trial Court did not bring into consideration the question of whether or not respondent / plaintiff had sufficient cause for his non-appearance while allowing his application---Trial Court acted in excess of its jurisdiction under law---Trial Court was under obligation to apply test of sufficient cause and had documented its reasons as to why its conscience was satisfied that non-appearance of respondent / plaintiff before Trial Court on date fixed was excusable in accordance with law---High Court set aside order restoring the suit and remanded the matter to Trial Court for decision afresh on application--- Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English