MUHAMMAD ZAMAN vs HAMEEDULLAH S — 2022 MLD 961 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2022 MLD 961 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: MLD
Parties: MUHAMMAD ZAMAN vs HAMEEDULLAH S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 13---E

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN VS HAMEEDULLAH S.13---Ejectment application for 3 shops was filed by the Landlord/appellant on grounds of wilful default and personal bona fide need---Respondent (tenant) contested the application on ground that neither the appellant was owner of property nor respondent had ever been inducted as tenant of appellant; that another person was actual owner of the shops in question; that respondents were employees of said another person; and that he (the other person) filed suit for correction of mutation entries---Eviction application was dismissed by Rent Controller---Validity---Record transpired that the appellant produced rent agreements and produced marginal witnesses who confirmed the factum of rent agreements---Oath Commissioner produced the rent agreements---Appellant also produced halqa Patwari who produced record showing that appellant, his mother and sisters were owners of the land in question---Respondents neither produced any sale deed in order to confirm the factum of sale/purchase in favour of said other person---Mere bald assertion could not rebut the document---Respondents' witnesses admitted in cross-examination that the suit land was still in the name of appellant in the revenue record---Respondents had no other capacity for retaining possession than as tenant---Pendency of suit for specific performance of the agreement was no ground to avoid eviction of the tenant by the Rent Controller---Law did not impose any embargo on landlord to establish any business but sole testimony of landlord was sufficient to establish personal bona fide need---Appeal was accepted accordingly. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 MLD

2022 MLD 1664 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANSUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE VS MUHAMMAD RAHIM When a law requires anything to be done in a particular manner, it should b…
2022 MLD 584 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREABDULLAH KHAN VS State R.6---Report of result of test or analysis---Mandatory provision---Scope---Rule 6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (…
2022 MLD 563 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANSyed GULISTAN VS GULAB KHAN Evidence beyond pleadings---Scope---Where the party has not alleged any ground in pleadings, subsequent evidence…
2022 MLD 1612 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSULEMAN VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If a single circumstance created reasonable doubt in a prudent mind about the apprehension o…
2022 MLD 663 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREIMTIAZ AHMAD VS State Witness---Statement of injured witness, reliance upon---Scope---Injuries on the person of a witness may established hi…
2022 MLD 1195 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORELIAQAT ALI VS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUJRAT S.3---Intra court Appeal before High Court----Scope---Original Order---Scope---Application before H…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English