PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

PAKISTAN POST OFFICE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Ss — 2022 PCrLJ 1687 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2022 PCrLJ 1687 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
PAKISTAN POST OFFICE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 23; S. 12; National Accountability Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

PAKISTAN POST OFFICE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Ss. 12 & 23---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Freezing and caution---Applicability---Restraining transfer of assets without freezing order---Effect---Petitioner was a cooperative housing society and aggrieved of notice under S. 23 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, restraining it from alienation of any land---Validity---Dispute over land was between private persons i.e. petitioner and beneficiaries of tampering in record of rights---Government had nothing to do with it and had not suffered any loss in any terms, nor at any point in time had its land involved or come under question to warrant interference by National Accountability Bureau (NAB)---Determination of title of land in favour of either party was pending in a civil suit---In inquiry by NAB nothing against petitioner was being looked into---Report of inquiry upheld claim of petitioner over land and showed that it was petitioner which was at receiving end from machinations of revenue officials done in league with some private persons---Provision of S. 23 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, was meant to hamper accused from creating third party interest in property acquired through illegal means and thereby making it difficult for the government to retrieve it but no such situation was extant---Endless enforcement of caution was harsh and to the detriment of only petitioner's right to deal with its land in accordance with law, and was ergo against tenets of natural justice---Without first exercising powers of freezing property under S. 12 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, S. 23 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, could not be pressed into service---High Court High declined to give carte blanche to NAB to deprive owner to deal with his property when he was not an accused in any enquiry or investigation pending with NAB on allegations of acquiring said property through illegal means and when there was no chance of his alienating the property by creating third party interest in it and thus making it difficult for the government to recover it---High Court set aside caution notices issued by NAB---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English