ABID HUSSAIN vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 110 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

ABID HUSSAIN VS State Ss. 302(b), 382 & 411---Qatl-i-amd, theft after preparation for committing murder or hurt, receiving stolen property---Appreciation of evidence--- Weapon of offence was recovered at the instance of accused---Reliance---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the sister of complainant by cutting her throat, accused also took away three gold ear rings and two nose rings of the deceased---Record showed that churri was recovered at the instance of accused---Such recovery was inconsequential for the reason that the occurrence took place on 14.5.2016, chhurri was got recovered by the accused on 3.6.2016, which was received in the office of Forensic Science Agency on 10.6.2016, therefore, it was unlikely that the blood on the chhurri would not disintegrate during the above mentioned period---Circumstances established that the prosecution could not prove its case against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

ABID HUSSAIN vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 110 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Judgment text as reported