SADAM ULLAH vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 123 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

SADAM ULLAH VS State Ss. 302 & 34--- Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence--- Benefit of doubt--- Extra-judicial confession---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the deceased then injured/complainant---Trial Court had relied upon the alleged extra-judicial confession of the accused but the record showed that he had not confessed his guilt rather the same was the statement before police which had no evidentiary value under Art. 38 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. Head Notes

SADAM ULLAH vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 123 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported