KHALIL-UR-REHMAN alias BHOLOO vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 25 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

KHALIL-UR-REHMAN alias BHOLOO VS State Ss. 302, 324 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Contradictions in the statements of witnesses---Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of the brother of the complainant by firing---Complainant, the brother of the deceased, in his cross-examination stated that Investigating Officer had secured bloodstained earth and empties from the place of occurrence---However, the Investigating Officer in his evidence had denied that assertion by stating that he had not recovered any empty or blood stained earth from the scene---Evidence of complainant could not be treated/accepted as gospel truth for the reasons that on one hand it was without any corroboration on material points and on other hand due to admitted enmity in between both the parties---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

KHALIL-UR-REHMAN alias BHOLOO vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 25 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported