ZAIN-UD-DIN vs NOOR MUHAMMAD Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 26 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

ZAIN-UD-DIN VS NOOR MUHAMMAD Ss. 302(b) & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Benefit of doubt---Dishonest improvement on part of complainant---Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of father of the complainant by firing---Record showed that the site plan was prepared at the instance of the complainant, where the inter-se distance between the three i.e. the assailants and the deceased was given as one pace each---Complainant when appeared before the court stated that the accused and deceased were at a distance of 06/08 paces from one another---Said was a dishonest improvement on part of the complainant as he wanted to toe the lines with the medical evidence, as no charring marks were mentioned in the post-mortem report---Circumstances established that the acquittal judgment was well reasoned, which called for no interference---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. Head Notes

ZAIN-UD-DIN vs NOOR MUHAMMAD Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 26 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported