MUHAMMAD NOMAN vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 95 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

MUHAMMAD NOMAN VS State Ss. 302(b), 392, 344 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, robbery, wrongful confinement for ten or more days, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay in lodging the FIR---Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of the father of complainant and then robbing different articles from his house---Murder was said to have occurred at 1:30 p.m. but was not reported to the police till 3:30 p.m. and the FIR was not lodged till 12:30 a.m. the next day---Requirement of proximity of time for last seen together evidence was not satisfied nor was the delay in lodging the FIR adequately explained---Circumstances established that it would be unsafe to sustain a conviction on the basis of the evidence produced at trial---Appeals against conviction were allowed, in circumstances.

MUHAMMAD NOMAN vs State Ss — 2022 PCrLJN 95 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported