PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

GHULAM MUSTAFA vs CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S — 2022 PLC 165 NATIONAL-INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS-COMMISSION

Case information

Citation
2022 PLC 165 NATIONAL-INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS-COMMISSION
Year
2022
Reporter
PLC
Parties
GHULAM MUSTAFA vs CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S
Provisions referred to
S. 33---G

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

GHULAM MUSTAFA VS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S.33---Grievance petition---Scope---Petitioner, asserted that the department advertised several posts and the petitioner applied for the post of Stenographer BS-15; that he qualified the test and interview for the post of Stenographer but he was appointed as a Steno-typist in BS-12; that one of the other candidates had secured 65 marks whereas he had secured 70 marks but the said candidate was appointed at Stenographer and the petitioner was appointed as Steno-typist in violation of merit and prayed that he might be treated at par with the said candidate as he was qualified and was illegally appointed as Steno-typist---Validity---Petitioner was appointed in the year 2008 and had been working as Steno-typist for a period of 10 years---Grievance petition was filed without any application for condonation of delay---Petition, being hit by limitation, was not maintainable and was accordingly dismissed. Head Notes

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English