PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SANA SOHAIL KHAN vs NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION Ss — 2022 PLC 167 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 PLC 167 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLC
Parties
SANA SOHAIL KHAN vs NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SANA SOHAIL KHAN VS NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION Ss.2(xxxiii) & 54---Qanun-e-Shahadat (X of 1984), Arts.117 & 120---"Workman"---Proof---Onus to prove---Shifting of onus, principle of---Applicability---Petitioner was employee of respondent / employer company who was aggrieved of her dismissal from service---Petitioner was reinstated in service but Full Bench of National Industrial Relation Commission (N.I.R.C.) declared petitioner as not a workman and maintained dismissal order---Validity---In order to approach N.I.R.C. for redress of grievance, petitioner was required to show that she fell in the definition of 'workman'/'worker'---Where evidence was led by petitioner to claim that she was a 'workman' there-after in order to challenge jurisdiction of N.I.R.C. to entertain dispute it was upon respondent/employer to show through evidence or other material available on record that petitioner was not a 'workman'---National Industrial Relations Commission to determine such aspect of the matter was required to read evidence and material available on record as a whole to reach at just conclusion in the matter---National Industrial Relations Commission could not rely upon a single sentence or a portion of evidence in piecemeal to determine the question whether petitioner was a 'workman' or not---Determination of such question was to determine jurisdiction of N.I.R.C. to entertain the dispute---Order passed by Full Bench of N.I.R.C. suffered from jurisdictional defect of misreading and non-reading of record, and the order resulted in miscarriage of justice and was not sustainable---High Court set aside order and remanded the matter to Full Bench of N.I.R.C. to decide the question whether petitioner fell within the definition of 'worker' / 'workman' and thereafter decide the dispute afresh on its own merits---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English