MUHAMMAD RIZWAN ARSHAD vs Hafiz ABDUL SATTAR advertisement for appointment — 2022 PLC(CS) 270 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation: 2022 PLC(CS) 270 ISLAMABAD
Court: Islamabad High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: PLC
Parties: MUHAMMAD RIZWAN ARSHAD vs Hafiz ABDUL SATTAR advertisement for appointment
Subject matter: Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD RIZWAN ARSHAD VS Hafiz ABDUL SATTAR advertisement for appointment---Relaxation of age---Scope---Department invited applications for appointment against different posts including assistant Scientific Officer (Hakeem) BPS 16---applicant was required to have a domicile of Punjab and be 28 years of age on the closing date for submission of applications---appellant was 39 years of age when he applied for the post---appellant was appointed against the post by giving him general age relaxation of 5 years under the Establishment Division Office Memorandum dated 24-06-2010 in addition to age relaxation of 10 years under the Establishment Division's Notification dated 04-11-1993---Respondent challenged appellant's appointment by filing writ petition which was allowed---Validity---age relaxation of 10 years under the later notification could only be extended to government servants who had completed 2 years of continuous government service on the closing date for receipt of applications---Benefit under the said notification only applied to the Federal Government servants who had completed 2 years of continuous service in the Federal Government---appellant was not employee of Federal Government rather he had completed his two years of service in Provincial Government, therefore, benefit of age relaxation of 15 years granted by department to the appellant was unlawful---appeal was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLC

2022 PLC 62 SUPREME-COURTDIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, QUETTA POSTAL DIVISION VS MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S. 25(1)--- Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ord…
2022 PLC 62 SUPREME-COURTDIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, QUETTA POSTAL DIVISION VS MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S. 2(1)(b)(iii)---Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012), S. 2(xxxiii)--…
2022 PLC(CS) 1603 SUPREME-COURTHADAYAT ULLAH VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN art. 188---Review jurisdiction of the Supreme Court---Scope---Review jurisdiction of the Court opera…
2022 PLC(CS) 646 ISLAMABADNAEEM ANWAR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Textile arts.91, 92, 93 & 67(1)---Power of advisor to the…
2022 PLC 15 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTKHALID VS PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY AKORA KHATTAK, DISTRICT OWSHERA, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA S.2(i)---"Salesman", status of---Scope---Work of sale…
2022 PLC(CS) 73 ISLAMABADHAMID NASRULLAH RANJHA VS CHIEF COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD, ICT Deputation---Scope---Government servant begins to be regarded as a deputationis…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English