PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ZAHID ALI vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Overseas Pakistani and Human Resource Development Rr — 2022 PLC(CS) 32 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2022 PLC(CS) 32 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLC
Parties
ZAHID ALI vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Overseas Pakistani and Human Resource Development Rr

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ZAHID ALI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Overseas Pakistani and Human Resource Development Rr.50, 51, 52 & 57---Powers of the authority---Grounds of penalty---Procedure for disciplinary action---Scope---Within the scheme of the Workers' Welfare Fund (Employees Service) Rules, 1997, the adjudication of the question of misconduct is to be undertaken by the authorized officer, and where no authorized officer is appointed, by the authority which acts as the authorized officer under R. 50---It is at the stage of enforcing a penalty that the powers of the authorized officer have been circumscribed: he can impose a minor penalty but not a major penalty---If he imposes a minor penalty, the matter rests there---Likewise, if he forms an opinion that misconduct has not been proved, the matter rests there---Workers' Welfare Fund (Employees Service) Rules, 1997, vests no suo motu or review or revisional powers in the authority to step into the shoes of authorized officer during such period when the adjudication of the charge is underway or to override the opinion of the authorized officer in exercise of revisional powers in the event that the authorized officer concludes that the charge has not been proven---In order to find such suo motu or revisional power, one would need to read into the text of Workers' Welfare Fund (Employees Service) Rules, 1997 such language that does not exist---If the decision to drop disciplinary proceedings or exonerate an accused officer in exercise of authority vested in an authorized officer under the Workers' Welfare Fund (Employees Service) Rules, 1997, could be overridden by the authority, as it were not to be bound by opinion of the authorized officer, the Workers' Welfare Fund (Employees Service) Rules, 1997 could have easily said so.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English