PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ZAKIR ULLAH vs DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, SWAT AT GULKADA SAIDU SHARIF, SWAT R — 2022 PLC(CS) 886 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2022 PLC(CS) 886 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLC
Parties
ZAKIR ULLAH vs DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, SWAT AT GULKADA SAIDU SHARIF, SWAT R
Subject matter
Service

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ZAKIR ULLAH VS DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, SWAT AT GULKADA SAIDU SHARIF, SWAT R.10(4)---Quota reserved for appointment of retired employees' sons---Petitioners contended that authorities did not consider to appoint them under quota reserved for retired employees' sons---Validity---Grievance redressal mechanism was provided by Provincial Government, therefore, sons of all former employees, claiming rights under the quota, if their grievance was not redressed by their respective competent authorities, would approach appropriate forums provided for redressal of grievances---Unless and until they had availed that remedy at departmental end, they would not be able to invoke Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Unless matters were finalized at departmental end and final orders were passed, the matter could not be brought under adjudication in Constitutional Court, except in those cases, where there had been an express case of want of jurisdiction, mala fide or a situation where actions of administrative authorities, if allowed to continue would perpetuate injustice---High Court directed to send the petition to respective Grievance Committees of concerned departments and all petitions would be treated as representations filed before them---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Head Notes

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English