PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD UMAIS vs CANTONMENT BOARD RAWALPINDI arts — 2022 PLD 148 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 PLD 148 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLD
Parties
MUHAMMAD UMAIS vs CANTONMENT BOARD RAWALPINDI arts
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD UMAIS VS CANTONMENT BOARD RAWALPINDI arts. 9, 14, 15, 26 & 199---Security of person---Inviolability of dignity of man---Freedom of movement---Non-discrimination in respect of access to public places---Reasonable restriction---Scope---Petitioner claimed that the closure of a section of road by the respondents during peak hours of the evening for vehicular traffic had infringed his fundamental rights of dignity, movement, right to life and access to public places---Validity---Restriction imposed by authorities had not negated the right of movement rather it had regulated its exercise and the area still remained open and accessible for general public but only vehicular access was restricted for certain definite amount of time and pedestrian access through walking was available to the general public for that particular time---Freedom of movement was not infringed or denied in that limited area of sit out cafes rather the mode of moving freely through that specific portion of the area for specific amount of time was restricted only to the extent of vehicular access and not of the person himself---Petitioner had remained unable to point out any violation of fundamental rights, justiciable within the ambit of art. 199 of the Constitution---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English