PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS ARAIN vs State arts — 2022 PLD 222 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2022 PLD 222 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLD
Parties
MUHAMMAD YOUNUS ARAIN vs State arts
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS ARAIN VS State arts. 72, 73, 74 & 79---Document, tendering in evidence---Effect---Tendering of document in evidence does not imply that it has been accepted by Court as an admissible piece of evidence and its probative value has to be looked into and determined---To produce original document (primary evidence) or its certified copy etc. (secondary evidence) is basically mode of proving the document itself, its existence and not the contents it contains---Determination of evidentiary or probative value of contents of a document is the next stage which is undertaken only after existence or execution of a document has been established either through primary or secondary evidence as the case may be---First stage is to prove existence of a document itself, once it is past positively, second stage to prove the contents document seeks to convey comes into play.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English