PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AZHAR ABBAS HAIDERI vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB S — 2022 PLD 278 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 PLD 278 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLD
Parties
AZHAR ABBAS HAIDERI vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 5---C; S. 5; Public Order Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AZHAR ABBAS HAIDERI VS GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB S. 5---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 20 & 199---Freedom to profess religion and to manage religious institutions---Power to control suspected persons---Discretionary jurisdiction of Deputy Commissioner---Judicial review, non-availability of---Availability of alternate remedy---Scope---Grievance of the petitioner pertained to an order passed by the Deputy Commissioner whereby he was barred to enter in a district to take part in any majlis and making any speech there because according to the respondents the previously registered FIR against the petitioner for making derogatory/objectionable speech was clearly reflective of the fact that his speech could cause serious prejudice to the law and order of the society and pose a potential threat to the peace and tranquility of the area---Validity---Deputy Commissioner was competent under S. 5(1) of the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, to pass an order directing that a person shall not enter, reside or remain in any area as specified therein in order to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to public safety or public interest or the maintenance of public order---Executive functionaries had to be given autonomy of discretion with enough space to carry out their job without let or hindrance as it was essential as well as expedient that exercise of freedom was to be reasonably regulated on administrative considerations on the paramountcy of larger public interest because the public functionaries and executive authorities were the best judges to evaluate the nature and magnitude of threats so as to take all appropriate remedial measures/steps required to obviate impending disasters and these were not justiciable issues---Order passed by the Deputy Commissioner was well within his competence and defined domain---Constitutional petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English