PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

BAHRIA TOWN (PVT.) LTD. vs DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, RAWALPINDI Ss — 2022 PLD 488 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 PLD 488 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PLD
Parties
BAHRIA TOWN (PVT.) LTD. vs DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, RAWALPINDI Ss
Provisions referred to
S. 2; S. 25; Goods Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

BAHRIA TOWN (PVT.) LTD. VS DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, RAWALPINDI Ss. 25, 2(c), 2(j) & 2(k)---Consumer---Product---Services---Filing of claims---Scope---Clause (i) of subsection 2(c) of the Act deals with the 'product' which is defined under S. 2(j) of the Act and has been given synonymous status of the term 'goods' under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930---While clause (ii) of subsection 2(c) of the Act states about 'services' which is defined under S. 2(k) of the Act---In order to bring a claim under S. 25 before the Consumer Court, a person must qualify to be a 'consumer' having been suffered damage due to defective or faulty product hired from a service provider and for this purpose, he has to qualify that he has purchased or obtained on lease any product for a consideration or hired any services for a consideration from service provider---'Services' mentioned under S. 2(k) includes provision of facilities or advice or assistance of medical, legal or engineering related services but S. 2(k)(i) specifically put a restriction on a consumer to bring his claim before the Consumer Court if the services relate to a contract of personal nature---Under S. 2(j) of the Act, the word 'immovable' is mentioned but it is clearly restricted to 'product'.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English