PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, FAISALABAD vs AL-SEHAR MANUFACTURER (PVT — 2022 PTD 1010 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN

Case information

Citation
2022 PTD 1010 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN
Year
2022
Reporter
PTD
Parties
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, FAISALABAD vs AL-SEHAR MANUFACTURER (PVT
Provisions referred to
S. 45B---; S. 45B

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, FAISALABAD VS AL-SEHAR MANUFACTURER (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD S.45B---appeals---Inquiry---Scope---Taking evidence is one of the ingredients of an act of inquiry to find out the real truth of the matter---Word 'further' means that the Commissioner (appeals) can inquire into matter in furtherance of any previous inquiry already held and that denotes the previous inquiry held by the taxation officer at the stage of adjudication---Provision leaves no ambiguity that the Commissioner (appeals) is empowered to make any inquiry in furtherance of any previous inquiry held by the taxation officer at the adjudication stage if after due consideration and application of mind the Commissioner (appeals) deems it appropriate and necessary---Commissioner (appeals) may entertain or take evidence produced before him for the purpose of inquiry to find out the truth---Commissioner (appeals), after making such inquiry is debarred from remanding the matter to the lower authority for de novo consideration and is required to pass the order under S. 45B(2).

Other judgments reported in 2022 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English