2022 PTD 1279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2022 PTD 1279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: PTD

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SUMMIT BANK LTD. VS PROVINCE OF SINDH Law prescribing period of limitation is to be considered as procedural rather than substantive; though where right to commence a proceeding has already become time barred then a subsequent enlargement of time through an amendment can be of no avail, as with the lapse of time prescribed, the transaction becomes a past and close transaction vesting a party with a right thus accrued which cannot be taken away by a subsequent amendment.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PTD

2022 PTD 683 SUPREME-COURTNAUBAHAR BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Revenue Division Ministry of Finance Scope---Judgment is an autho…
2022 PTD 1860 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHIMAD SAMAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad S.19---General power to exempt from customs…
2022 PTD 1860 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHIMAD SAMAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad Precedent---Constitution of a larger Bench-…
2022 PTD 1860 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHIMAD SAMAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad S.3---Power to prohibit or restrict imports…
2022 PTD 1665 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTANNAVEED ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD Ss. 3 & 7---Scope of sales tax---Determination…
2022 PTD 1010 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTANCOMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, FAISALABAD VS AL-SEHAR MANUFACTURER (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD S.45B---appeal---Inquiry---Scope---Com…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English