PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

OBS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Ex-Officio Chairman Federal Board of Revenue Ss — 2022 PTD 290 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2022 PTD 290 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PTD
Parties
OBS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Ex-Officio Chairman Federal Board of Revenue Ss
Subject matter
Tax & Customs
Provisions referred to
S. 4; S. 170; S. 221; Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971); Income Tax Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

OBS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Ex-Officio Chairman Federal Board of Revenue Ss.170 & 221---Workers' Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971), S.4 (1)---Federal Board of Revenue Circular No.4 of 2000 dated 17-2-2000 (FBR Circular)---Workers' Welfare Fund---Adjustment, availing of---Retrospective effect of Circular---Scope---Petitioners / companies were required to contribute towards their workers' welfare as Workers' Welfare Fund---Authorities on the basis of a FBR Circular declined adjustment of Workers' Welfare Fund liabilities against tax refund---Validity---Federal Board of Revenue Circular in question had only restored process of S.170 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for claiming refund only however the actions which had already been taken thereunder were not open for a scrutiny at least under S.221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Notification in question had prospective effect only---Adjustments made and allowed on the basis of FBR Circular No.4 could not be subjected to the provisions of S.221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--- Applications made under S.170 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for refund had limitation of three years in terms of S.170(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 i.e. deemed assessment or when tax was paid whereas deemed assessment itself could not be subjected to amendment within five years of such deemed assessment---Purpose which could not be achieved under S.170 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, was available under other provisions of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---High Court declared that subject of notices in question issued under S.221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, claiming Workers' Welfare Fund prior to the effect of FBR Circular No.4 dated 25-5-2001, were illegal and unlawful for the purposes of S.221 Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---High Court declared that FBR Circular No.4 dated 25-5-2021, issued by Federal Board of Revenue under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, was lawful and had its prospective effect---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English