PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, ISLAMABAD vs AAMIR MUMTAZ QURESHI Ss — 2022 SCMR 1861 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2022 SCMR 1861 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2022
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, ISLAMABAD vs AAMIR MUMTAZ QURESHI Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 8---C; S. 265-K---S; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947); Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, ISLAMABAD VS AAMIR MUMTAZ QURESHI Ss. 2(s), 8, 70, 156(1) & 157---Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947), S. 8---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 265-K---Smuggling of foreign currency---Acquittal of accused by Trial Court under section 265-K, Cr.P.C.---Legality---Accused was apprehended at the airport and a huge amount of currency, which he was trying to smuggle to a foreign country, was recovered from him---Argument that the accused had filed an application before the State Bank of Pakistan for permission to take away the currency to the foreign country, had no force because mere filing of an application for permission by itself was not sufficient to allow him to smuggle the currency outside the country, until the permission was granted and in the present case admittedly, no permission was ever granted by the State Bank of Pakistan---Plea of accused that he was not aware of the fact that foreign currency amounting to more than US$ 10,000 (US dollars ten thousand) could not be taken away from the country, contradicted his own defence, as on one hand he claimed that he had filed an application for permission to take a huge amount of foreign currency out of the country and on the other hand he was not aware of the fact that he could not take foreign currency beyond a certain limit outside the country---Argument of the accused that he was a Hajj Tour Operator and had not committed any offence of taking away/ smuggling foreign currency from the country, had no force because being a Hajj Tour Operator he had no license to smuggle the foreign currency outside the country---Sufficient material was available on record connecting the accused with the commission of the alleged crime and it was incumbent upon the Trial Court to record the evidence but instead of recording the evidence to prove the guilt or otherwise of the accused, the Trial Court in a slipshod manner, acquitted him under section 265-K Cr.P.C.---If the allegations levelled in the FIR supported by the preliminary evidence were admitted to be true, it could not be said at that stage by the Trial Court that there was no probability of conviction of the accused---In order to ascertain the genuineness of the allegations, the Trial Court ought to have allowed the prosecution to lead evidence---Petition for leave to appeal was converted into an appeal and allowed, orders of the Trial Court and High Court were set aside and the matter was remanded to the Trial Court to record the evidence and decide the case upon the evidence produced before it. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2022 SCMR 1861 SUPREME-COURTBookmark this Case MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, ISLAMABAD VS AAMIR MUMTAZ QURESHI Ss. 249-a & 265-K---acquittal under section 249-a or 265-K, Cr.P.C.---Scope---In appellate or revisional proceedings, the same sanctity cannot be accorded to acquittals at intermediary stages such as under section 249-a or 265-K, Cr.P.C., as available for those recorded and based on full-fledged trial after recording of evidence---In appeal or revision proceedings, the order of acquittal of the accused under section 249-a or section 265-K of the Cr.P.C. would not have the same sanctity as orders of acquittal on merits---Consequently, the principles which are to be observed and applied in setting aside concurrent findings of acquittal or the principle relating to the presumption of double innocence when an accused is acquitted after a full-fledged inquiry and trial, would not be applicable to the acquittals under section 249-a, Cr.P.C. or section 265-K, Cr.P.C. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2022 SCMR 1861 SUPREME-COURTBookmark this Case MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, ISLAMABAD VS AAMIR MUMTAZ QURESHI Ss. 249-a & 265-K---Power of Magistrate/Court to acquit accused at any stage---Principles. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English