PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

NANDOMAL vs The P — 2022 YLR 1017 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 1017 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
NANDOMAL vs The P
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

NANDOMAL VS The P.O. SINDH through Secretary, Rehabilitation Sindh Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.I, R.10---Suit for declaration and injunction---Evacuee property--- Non-impleading necessary parties---Subsequent purchaser for value---Concurrent findings of facts by two Courts below---Applicants/plaintiffs claimed to be in possession of suit property and sought its allotment in their favour---Plea raised by applicants/ plaintiffs was that allotment in favour of defendant/respondent was a result of collusion with authorities---Validity---Applicants/plaintiffs should have made subsequent purchasers as one of the defendants, who was necessary and proper party in terms of O. I, R.10, C.P.C.--- Predecessor-in-interest of applicants/plaintiffs opted not to implead subsequent purchaser as one of the defendants, who was bona fide purchaser for value and his rights and interests in respect of suit property were protected and could not be set aside, except through a proper proceedings---No collusion between official and private respondents inter se, inter alia---"Provisional Transfer Order" was issued by Settlement Department on 11-11-1959 and "Permanent Transfer Deed", which was a title document, was issued on 25-10-1967---When the same was challenged after six years through revision proceedings before authorities, it was rightly dismissed vide order dated 29-09-1973---No undue haste was present in such entire exercise of allotment of suit property to respondent/defendant---High Court declined to interfere in concurrent findings of two Courts below as the same did not suffer from any material irregularity, illegality nor were contrary to record---Revision was dismissed in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English