PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUNAZIR ALI RANJHA vs MUHAMMAD AHMAD SAQIB art — 2022 YLR 1187 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 1187 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
MUNAZIR ALI RANJHA vs MUHAMMAD AHMAD SAQIB art
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 24-

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUNAZIR ALI RANJHA VS MUHAMMAD AHMAD SAQIB art. 199---General Clauses act (X of 1897), S.24-a---Constitutional petition---Reasons for decision---Scope---Petitioner/ defendant assailed the concurrent dismissal of his application for cancellation of written statement as well as power of attorney---Contention of petitioner, inter alia, was that he neither appointed any advocate nor authorized any person to file conceding written statement on his behalf---Validity---Revisional Court had neither noted the contentions of petitioner nor properly thrashed out while passing impugned order, thus, same lacked valid lawful reasons and was passed in violation of the provisions of S. 24-a of General Clauses act, 1897, which had bound down the Judge to assign reasoning and pass speaking order/judgment---Where the reasons were not forthcoming from the impugned order/judgment, the High Court was deprived of the valuable views of the subordinate forum---Impugned revisional order was amenable to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Constitutional petition was allowed and the case was remanded to the Revisional Court for decision afresh.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English