PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD ASLAM vs State Ss — 2022 YLR 1345 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 1345 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
MUHAMMAD ASLAM vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS State Ss. 302, 324, 337-a(i), 337-a(iv), 337-a(vi), 337-D, 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, shajjah-i-khafifah, Shajjah-i-munaqqilah, causing shajjah-i-damighah, jaifah, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Prosecution case was that the accused party while armed with deadly weapons made indiscriminate firing upon the complainant, due to which nephew of complainant died while his brother was seriously injured---Ocular account of the incident had been furnished by the complainant and injured witness---Both the said eye-witnesses stated in their statements regarding roles of the accused that accused made fire shot with Kalashnikov which hit on the left side of abdomen of injured witness---Second fire shot made by him hit on the right cheek of deceased---Co-accused made fire shot of Kalashnikov which hit deceased on his back---Other co-accused persons had also been attributed firearm injuries on the persons of deceased and injured, who had been acquitted by the trial court by disbelieving evidence of both the said eye-witnesses--- Complainant/State had not filed any appeal against their acquittal---Same evidence could not be believed to the extent of the accused persons in absence of independent corroborative piece of evidence which was conspicuously missing in the present case---Motive was not attributed to the accused rather was attributed to co-accused who had died---Recovery of Kalashnikovs on pointing out of the accused persons in presence of negative report of Forensic Science agency was not only inconsequential but also drew adverse inference--- Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused persons beyond any reasonable doubt---appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English