PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD ILYAS vs State S — 2022 YLR 2042 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 2042 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
MUHAMMAD ILYAS vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 458---O; S. 20---L

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD ILYAS VS State S. 458---Offences against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) act (XII of 1985), S. 20---Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint---Haraabah liable to tazir---appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Scope---Prosecution case was that the accused along with co-accused had designed and plotted dacoity in the house of the complainant---Prosecution case revolved around the central axis of recovery of the stolen articles---Statements of marginal witnesses of recovery memo. and complainant had put considerable question marks on the whole prosecution story---Marginal witnesses had admitted that the recovery memo was prepared and signed at the police station---Stand taken by the prosecution that stolen articles were recovered at the indication of accused from his house was blatantly refuted and denied---after excluding the recoveries of stolen articles on the indication of accused nothing remained with the prosecution to justify the conviction of accused---Court below had fallen in error while convicting the accused because prosecution had failed to prove the guilt of the accused to hilt and to prove its case beyond shadow of rational or plausible doubt---accused was neither nominated in the FIR nor identification parade was conducted thus the sole evidence relied upon by the prosecution was recoveries of stolen articles which was not prepared in accordance with the required standard that could justify or vindicate conviction---Designing and planning to commit the dacoity amongst the accused persons was not proved---Co-accused was acquitted by the court below while discrediting the evidence harvested by the prosecution, however, on the basis of same and identical evidence the accused was convicted which was unjustified---appeal was accepted and the accused was acquitted of the charges, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English