PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ALLAH DITTA vs MUHAMMAD YASIN S — 2022 YLR 46 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 46 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
ALLAH DITTA vs MUHAMMAD YASIN S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 52---Q; S. 2; Civil Procedure Code

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ALLAH DITTA VS MUHAMMAD YASIN S. 52---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 31---Suit for pre-emption by pre-emptors/respondents against another respondent was concurrently dismissed on ground of the non-fulfilment of necessary Talbs---Pre-emptors filed revision petition which was decreed after compromise based on written application and oral statement of special attorney of said another respondent---Applicants being subsequent bona fide purchasers filed application under S.2(2) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908---Held, that said another respondent posing himself as the owner of the suit property moved application for acceptance of the revision petition on compromise while he was not the owner of the suit property as he himself transferred the suit property in the name of present applicant---Respondent deliberately made false representation and made active concealment of fact from High Court, which amounted to fraud---At the time of decision of the revision petition on the basis of compromise, sad another respondent was not the owner of the suit property and had not possessed any interest in the suit property, therefore, his admission/statement regarding acceptance of the revision had no sanctity in the eye of law---Respondents also deliberately/knowingly concealed material facts regarding proceedings before Member Board of Revenue---Said revision petition was decided on collusive compromise, therefore, the mutation of exchange sanctioned in favour of one applicant was not hit by the principle of lis pendens---Respondents were attempting to take advantage of their own fraud through the process of court---Revision petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English