AQEELA ABID vs Ch — 2022 YLR 675 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2022 YLR 675 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: YLR
Parties: AQEELA ABID vs Ch
Subject matter: Rent
Provisions referred to: S. 10---O; S. 10; Punjab Rented Premises Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AQEELA ABID VS Ch. BASHIR AHMAD S. 10---Other agreement---Landlord and tenant, relationship of---Effect---In order to apply S.10 of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009, the agreement to sell must be between landlord and tenant if the person is in occupation of the premises by virtue of agreement to sell and not because he was a tenant, S.10 of the Act will have no bearing on the matter.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

2022 YLR 669 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREASIF SHAHZAD VS State Duty of prosecution--- Scope---Prosecution has to prove its case against the accused by standing on its own legs and i…
2022 YLR 669 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREASIF SHAHZAD VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If there was a single circumstance which created doubt regarding the prosecution case,…
2022 YLR 967 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURTMUHAMMAD VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay of six hours in lodging FIR---Scope---Accused…
2022 YLR 1891 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRKHURRUM SHAHZAD VS SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT POLICE, DISTRICT MIRPUR AZAD KASHMIR art. 44---Writ petition---Quashing of FIR---Scope---High Court…
2022 YLRN 161 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREABDUL HAFEEZ VS State art. 22---Test identification parade---Scope and purpose---Paramount purpose of test identification parade was to esta…
2022 YLRN 155 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREILYAS VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If there is a single circumstance which created doubt regarding the prosecution case, the same…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English